The push command has another option called -force-with-lease.
git checkout master git pull overleaf master -allow-unrelated. This provides a much less obtrusive way to undo a mistake. Pull the latest content from the Overleaf project and merge it into your master branch. However, consider using a tool that does NOT rewrite commit history, like git revert for example. Help & feedback Docs Edit this page to fix an error or add an improvement in a merge request. Then you can force push and protect it again.
The basic need for a tool to correct a mistake that you've already pushed, of course, remains. git push -force-with-lease origin my-feature-branch If the branch you want to force-push is protected, you can’t force push to it unless you either: Unprotect it.
If, on the other hand, you were working on a feature branch that only you yourself are using, then of course feel free to step on the gas and use the -force option. Whenever you have pushed commits to a remote branch that is shared with your team, you should try NOT to use force push. Since it is so easy to destroy or at least impede your colleagues' work, here are a few "safety rules" around git push -force:
Warning: this erases all commits from the master. Using the -f flag, your previous master is completely overwritten with develop, including its history. Your "force push" changes this history and means theirs is not in line with the new one anymore. A more brutal alternative is to force push the develop branch under a different name: git push -f origin develop:master. Also, even if no one else has pushed anything to the remote repository in the meantime, your colleagues might still have based their new work on the old commit history.
Generally one can rebase by doing the following: Pull the latest code from both the issue-123 and master branches with the following commands: git checkout master. This is a rather dangerous process, because it's very easy to overwrite (and thereby lose) commits from your colleagues. As an example, suppose one is working on the branch issue-123, and there have been improvements to the master branch. The -force option for git push allows you to override this rule: the commit history on the remote will be forcefully overwritten with your own local history. Only when you are up-to-date will you be able to push your own new commits to the remote. This overwrites the remote main branch to match the rebased one from your repository and makes things very confusing for the rest of your team. This is because although feat-b was merged into the master branch in the. This usage was sort of bolted on to the git provider after use case (1), so it's a bit unwieldy, I that is the correct usage for use case # 2.As described above, Git will normally only allow you to push your changes if you have previously updated your local branch with the latest commits from its remote counterpart. Once you're done, use git log -oneline -all -graph to confirm if you got it. In this case, you set enable_checkout to false which prevents the git provider from attempting to checkout master to master. Before rebasing Open your feature branch in the terminal: git checkout my-feature-branch Checkout a new branch from it: git checkout -b my-feature-branch. Usually this happens when you're maintaining developers' laptops with Chef. This way, if you want to switch from one branch to another, or only deploy certain tags (maybe you set with attributes or a data bag item), you just set the revision and the provider will always ensure you're on the correct commit by checking git ls-remote on the upstream repo. The git provider will locally maintain its own branch and force it to whatever commit you want. In this case you identify what commit you want from the upstream repo using the revision property of the git resource. You want to always sync a particular commit (which can change over time based on use of attributes, etc.).The git provider is designed to work two ways: In other words, we change the parent of our next-feature branch from commit C to commit G on the master branch. In the example below, the origin remote is a. If your current branch is main, the command git push will supply the two default parameterseffectively running git push origin main. By default, Git chooses origin for the remote and your current branch as the branch to push. You will now have to force push the changes to your GitHub ( origin ) master branch.
Copying from the other issue ( #3289 (comment) ) However, keep in mind that when you use tools like git log, you will see changes on top of the master branch. The general form of the command is this: git push